![]() He added that while Russia does have powerful Kornet laser-guided missiles, they are few in number, and most of the anti-tank missiles are Soviet-era Fagot and Konkur models. Pukhov further said that Russia’s inventory of anti-tank missiles lacks the modern third-generation anti-tank missile systems similar to Javelins that have been devastating Russian tanks. “In such a duel, we may find ourselves in disadvantageous conditions,” Pukhov said. However, the introduction of “Western tanks with powerful guns, modern armor-piercing shells, and fire control systems can lead to a sharp increase in the distances of tank battles.” The Russian military may find itself at a disadvantage in such a situation. Pukhov explained that the ammunition currently being used by the Russian tanks mainly comprises old Soviet shells which can defeat the Ukrainian T-64s, T-72s, and T-80s at relatively short distances. Even in export versions, the Abrams M1A2 SEP v.2 variant significantly outperforms any Russian production tank (the newest is the T-90M, the Armata has not yet gone into a large series),” Pukhov was quoted as saying by the Russian newspaper Moskovsky Komsomolets. “M1A2 SEP v.2/3 tanks are today the best in the world regarding the combination of combat potential. Ruslan Pukhov, director of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, a Russian think tank, believes that the deliveries of Abrams tanks to Ukraine can seriously aggravate the situation at the front on the battlefield for the Russians. Incapable Of Shooting ‘Low Altitude’ Targets, Russia Says Its S-350 Vityaz Much Superior To US’ Patriots A top Russian defense expert said that the supply of US-made M1 Abrams to Ukraine would add to the difficulties of the Russian military in Ukraine, as the M1 tank outperforms all of Russia’s serial-production tanks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |